What Indigenous Worldviews Teach Us About Building Accountable, Sustainable Companies

Indigenous peoples have long lived by values of reciprocity, respect for place, and responsibility to future generations. These principles shape systems that sustain life, support community, and hold power in balance. In a business context, they offer enduring guidance: how to lead with integrity, how to build for sustainability, and how to remain accountable to the people and ecosystems businesses depend on.

For B Corps and other purpose-driven companies, these values offer more than inspiration. They provide grounded, time-tested frameworks for governance, community building, and long-term impact, reminding us that sustainable business is, at its core, a relational act. By drawing from Indigenous worldviews, businesses can move beyond compliance and growth-at-all-costs to create companies that are resilient, values-driven, and rooted in intergenerational stewardship.

Lesson 1: Think Seven Generations Ahead

The concept of “Seven Generation Stewardship” is rooted in the Haudenosaunee (Iroquois) Confederacy’s Great Law of Peace. It teaches that decisions in governance, community life, and resource use must account for the well-being of people seven generations into the future—roughly 100 to 150 years, stretching from great-grandparents to great-grandchildren. Haudenosaunee leaders are instructed to ask of each decision: “What will this choice mean for those not yet born?”

Oren Lyons, Faithkeeper of the Onondaga Nation, describes this outlook as a trust: actions and decisions carry responsibility for the welfare of generations to come. The mandate is holistic, encompassing culture, language, ceremonies, and governance as well as the environment. As Lyons told the United Nations in 1992: “Even though you and I are in different boats, you in your boat and we in our canoe, we share the same River of Life—what befalls me, befalls you. And downstream, downstream in this River of Life, our children will pay for our selfishness, for our greed, and for our lack of vision.”

To keep this short-sightedness from taking root, businesses can draw on the same principle. Instead of orienting strategy around quarterly earnings or year-end results, it asks leaders to measure decisions against a much longer horizon: “Will this create value and resilience for people and ecosystems a century from now?”

For B Corps—and companies aspiring to become B Corps—this perspective extends stakeholder governance into the future. Earning and maintaining B Corp Certification requires balancing the interests of workers, customers, communities, and the environment alongside shareholders. Seven Generation Stewardship reminds us that stakeholders also include those yet to be born. Embedding this view means building organizations designed to endure, investing in continuity of culture and ecology, and treating today’s choices as legacies that future generations will inherit.

Lesson 2: Treat the Earth as a Stakeholder

Many Indigenous worldviews teach that the Earth is not property to be owned or a resource to be maximized, but a living relative. Land, water, animals, and plants are part of a shared web of kinship, and every interaction with them carries obligations of respect and reciprocity. This ethic of care contrasts with Western traditions that frame humans as separate from—or in dominion over—nature.

Traditional Ecological Knowledge (TEK) embodies this principle. Passed down through stories, ceremonies, and close observation, TEK integrates ecological insight with cultural and spiritual responsibility. It recognizes that ecosystems thrive when relationships among species, land, and people are kept in balance.

In the Andes, the Quechua and Aymara principle of ayni—sacred reciprocity—guides both social and ecological relationships: farmers give offerings to Pachamama (Mother Earth) before planting and harvesting, affirming a cycle of mutual care.

In Wisconsin, the Menominee Nation’s “forest-first” philosophy has sustained a 235,000-acre forest for more than 150 years. By treating the forest as a partner and blending Indigenous knowledge with modern forestry practices, the Menominee have supported biodiversity, sustained community livelihoods, and even grown their standing timber volume—from 1.3 billion board feet in 1870 to 1.7 billion today—despite continuous harvesting. Their model shows how reciprocity with the land yields resilience across generations.

For businesses, this lesson asks for a shift in posture. To treat the Earth as a stakeholder is not simply to manage environmental risk, but to enter into relationship with living systems. The question is not only “How do we reduce harm?” but also “What do we owe the rivers, forests, and soils that sustain us?”

For B Corps, this perspective can inform everything from sourcing practices to investment strategies. Embedding reciprocity might mean replenishing ecosystems rather than merely offsetting impact, or building genuine partnerships with Indigenous communities whose stewardship has safeguarded biodiversity worldwide. Prosperity becomes inseparable from planetary health when the Earth itself is recognized as a stakeholder at the decision-making table.

Lesson 3: Respect Place and Local Knowledge

For Indigenous peoples, knowledge is inseparable from place. Rather than interchangeable backdrops, landscapes are living contexts with unique cultural, spiritual, and ecological meaning. Respecting place means decisions must align with the specific ecosystems and communities in which they occur, rather than imposing uniform models that overlook local realities.

Traditional Knowledge (TK) reflects this grounding. It’s not static but evolves with experience, shaped by long-term observation of soil, water, seasons, and species. TK also holds the stories and ceremonies that bind communities to those places, reminding us that what sustains one valley or forest may not sustain another. In this sense, wisdom is always contextual: rooted in relationships specific to each land.

Examples from the Americas illustrate this place-based ethic. In the Pacific Northwest, salmon are regarded as relatives whose well-being is inseparable from that of the people. First Salmon ceremonies honor their return each year and establish harvesting practices that ensure rivers continue to sustain both fish and communities for generations.

In the arid Southwest, the Hopi have cultivated dryland farming techniques for centuries, adapting corn, beans, and squash to thrive without irrigation by reading rain, soil, and wind patterns unique to their mesas. Both traditions demonstrate how Indigenous knowledge is tied to specific landscapes, showing that resilience comes not from universal models but from honoring the particularities of place.

For businesses, this principle offers a corrective to “one-size-fits-all” strategies. Companies that honor place consider how their operations affect the specific ecologies, cultures, and economies in which they operate.

For B Corps, this might mean engaging stakeholders differently across regions, tailoring environmental practices to local ecosystems, or reinvesting profits in ways that reflect community priorities rather than corporate uniformity. Just as salmon stewardship and Hopi agriculture thrive by aligning with local realities, businesses can build deeper trust and longer-term resilience by embedding accountability in the places they call home.

Lesson 4: Design for Regeneration, Not Extraction

The Indigenous principle of regeneration, grounded in reciprocity and a cyclical understanding of time, contrasts sharply with extractive models that deplete resources in a one-way trajectory. In many Indigenous worldviews, time does not march forward in a straight line but moves in circles: past, present, and future are bound together, and each cycle carries responsibilities of renewal. Natural rhythms—seasons, planting and harvest, life and death—demonstrate that balance is restored not through endless growth but through return.

For Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples of Australia, time is experienced as a relational continuum tied to Country. Actions taken today honor ancestors and prepare the ground for descendants, with the understanding that if Country is unwell, it must be healed before balance can continue.

Many Native American nations describe time as a “sacred hoop,” a circle of life, death, and rebirth. Agricultural practices such as the Three Sisters—planting corn, beans, and squash together—embody this circular ethic. Corn offers support for beans, beans restore soil fertility, and squash shades the ground to retain moisture and suppress weeds. Each plant gives and receives in turn, creating a self-sustaining system that enriches the soil, conserves resources, and nourishes communities across generations.

For businesses, this principle shifts the focus from sustaining the status quo to actively repairing and replenishing. Regeneration asks companies to design circular systems where waste becomes input, ecosystems are restored, and growth strengthens rather than exhausts natural foundations.

For B Corps, aligning with this principle means seeing business itself as part of natural cycles. It calls leaders to move from extraction to stewardship, from short-term output to intergenerational renewal—building practices that not only avoid harm but contribute to the resilience of the systems that make life and enterprise possible.

Lesson 5: Lead with Gender Balance and Relational Principles

Indigenous traditions of leadership often rest on principles of balance and relational accountability rather than concentrated authority. Many societies historically emphasized gender complementarity, where women held roles that balanced (and sometimes counterweighted) male authority, ensuring no single voice or interest could dominate. Leadership was not about hierarchy, but about designing systems where power was continually checked by responsibility to others.

Across North America, women in the Haudenosaunee Confederacy, for example, held and still hold authority not only to select but to depose chiefs. Clan mothers place leaders in office, advise their decisions, and hold the power to “knock off the horns” of a chief who fails to serve his people with integrity. Their responsibilities also extend to land use, food distribution, and decisions of war and peace, ensuring that political, economic, and ecological governance are all grounded in women’s authority.

Importantly, candidates for leadership cannot be warriors, nor men who have stolen or abused women, reflecting a governance ethic that ties power directly to moral character and relational responsibility. This structure enshrines women as guardians of accountability and protectors of community well-being across generations.

Equally vital is the principle of repair. Indigenous women often lead as healers: restoring ecological balance, resolving conflicts, and addressing intergenerational harm. Their leadership doesn’t just set direction; it actively mends the fabric of community life. In a business context, this expands the role of leadership from driving growth to repairing harm, both inside the organization and in the systems companies touch.

For B Corps, the lesson is clear: gender-balanced and relational governance is a framework for accountability and resilience. By embedding power-sharing and prioritizing repair, businesses can build governance structures that are less brittle, more just, and capable of enduring across generations.

Lesson 6: Practice Reciprocity in Every Exchange

Reciprocity is a foundational value in Indigenous cultures, shaping social and economic life through mutual exchange and shared responsibility. It emphasizes that relationships—whether between individuals, families, or communities—are sustained not by one-sided gain but by cycles of generosity and obligation.

In traditional societies, reciprocity guided trade networks, gift-giving, and everyday interactions, ensuring resources circulated and well-being was preserved. Exchanges were relational rather than transactional: gift-giving ceremonies reinforced care between families and clans, hunters honored the animals they relied on, and agricultural practices bound people and land in a covenant of mutual flourishing.

Even the landscape itself offers models of reciprocity. The Serviceberry—called bozakmin, “the best of the berries,” in Potawatomi—is a small fruit-bearing tree whose abundance depends on relationships with birds and animals that disperse its seeds. As Robin Wall Kimmerer (Citizen Potawatomi Nation) writes, “Serviceberries show us another model, one based upon reciprocity rather than accumulation, where wealth and security come from the quality of your relationships, not from the illusion of self-sufficiency… Hoarding won’t save us. All flourishing is mutual.”

For businesses, reciprocity means building relationships that are ethical, accountable, and enduring. It calls companies to create partnerships where benefits flow in both directions, to prioritize trust over transactions, to share power in decision-making, and to reinvest in the communities and ecosystems they touch. In practice, this might look like forming genuine collaborations with Indigenous communities, weaving cultural and ecological knowledge into governance, or ensuring that profits help restore rather than deplete.

Practicing reciprocity invites businesses to move beyond extractive logics and embrace an ethic of cooperation. It reframes prosperity not as accumulation but as mutual flourishing—an understanding at the heart of both Indigenous traditions and the B Corp movement’s commitment to stakeholder governance.

Lesson 7: Use Storytelling as Accountability

For Indigenous peoples, storytelling is more than art or entertainment: it’s a core practice of transmitting knowledge, values, and collective memory across generations. Through oral traditions, elders preserve cultural continuity, teaching moral lessons and reinforcing responsibilities to family, land, and community. Stories serve as a living archive: they educate, nurture relationships, and validate shared experiences while also holding individuals and communities accountable to cultural values.

This accountability arises because stories aren’t static; they’re part of a continuous dialogue that connects past, present, and future. Narratives communicate not only events but also ethical frameworks, reminding listeners of their obligations to one another and to the wider world. In Cree legal traditions, for instance, stories embed wahkohtowin—the principle of kinship and responsibility—ensuring that governance and social life remain rooted in relational ethics.

Businesses can draw from this Indigenous value by reimagining transparency as an ongoing story rather than a static report. Instead of limiting accountability to data points and disclosures, companies can share narratives that explain decisions, highlight challenges, and show how their actions align with values. Because stories invite reflection, dialogue, and critique, they create a form of accountability that is participatory rather than one-directional.

As an example, B Lab U.S. & Canada recently produced a documentary entitled Rooted in Resilience: Indigenous Women Entrepreneurs Leading with Tradition. It’s a powerful, 23-minute documentary that honors four Indigenous women entrepreneurs whose work reflects generations of wisdom, care, and connection—the very principles that have shaped what we now know as the B Corp movement. Through their stories, we witness how doing business with heart and intention can restore balance to both people and planet

In practice, storytelling as accountability means shifting from transactional updates to relational communication: progress reports become part of a longer journey, and impact is conveyed through values-driven narratives that stakeholders can engage with. For B Corps especially, this approach reinforces the principle that accountability is not only measured but lived, in dialogue with the communities they serve.

Carrying Indigenous Wisdom Forward

Copyright B Lab U.S. & Canada